Referee
  • Introduction
    • Academic Peer Review Today
    • Similar Projects
    • How Referee is Different
    • Limits of Current Practice
    • Needed Improvements
    • Proposed Solution
    • Conceptual Analogies
    • Stakeholders
    • Impact
  • System Design
    • Technical Architecture
    • Governance
      • Working Group (WG): CRWE
      • WG: Reliability Scoring Method
      • WG: AI Agents
      • WG: Bounty Setting & Claiming
      • WG: Marketing and Outreach
      • WG: Technical Architecture
      • WG: Specialised Academic Guilds
    • Users and Processes
      • User Journey: Bounty Provider
      • User Journey: Bounty Hunters
      • User Journey: Bounty Validators
    • Common Research Weakness Enumeration (CRWE)
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. System Design
  2. Governance

Working Group (WG): CRWE

Goal: To develop and maintain a transparent taxonomy of paper weaknesses that can be used to set bounties and provide unambiguous reasons why a paper is unreliable

Critical success factors:

  • Bounty-level weaknesses are appropriately granular and preferably constative to encourage bounties.

  • Bounty-level weaknesses are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive.

Necessary conditions and actions:

  • A transparent and open process for soliciting and approving improvement proposals to the framework

  • Continuous engagement with the academic community for updates and revisions to maintain relevance and adaptability

PreviousGovernanceNextWG: Reliability Scoring Method

Last updated 10 months ago